This material was extracted from official papers. It should be used only as a general guide.
Extract
|
Qty
|
Serial
Nos
|
Rem
|
|
Supt ROF Fazakerly
|
|
1A - 2000A
|
2000 rifles to be
assembled from existing No1 Mk6 rifle components made by Enfield.
Many were made into
No4 (T)s
|
|
BSA Guns
|
270000
|
0001 -9999
A0001 - A9999
& so on thro' alphabet
|
|
|
ROF Maltby
|
270000
|
10000 - 19999
A10000 - A19999
& so on thro' alphabet
|
|
|
ROF Fazakerly
|
|
20000 - 29999
A20000 - A29999
& so on thro' alphabet
then AA, BA, BB etc
|
|
|
ROF Faz
|
3000
|
2001A - 3000A
5001A - 6000A
7001A - 8000A
|
Components not interchangeable
|
Components for these
rifles were made by Enfield about 1935, shipped to Fazakerly in 1940. They
were actively sought out and destroyed in the early 1950s. ----Very few have
survived.
|
ROF Maltby
|
2000
|
3001A - 4000A
8001A - 9000A
|
Components not interchangeable
|
|
BSA Guns
|
13000
|
4001A - 5000A
6001A - 7000A
9001A - 10000A
10001A - 20000A
|
Components not interchangeable
|
|
BSA Shirley
|
230000
|
30000 - 39999
A30000 - A39999
& so on through alphabet
excluding I, J, O & W
also
A40000 - A79999
|
|
|
ROF Fazakerly
|
Repairs
|
#1 onwards, to cover rifles whose original numbers
had become obliterated.
|
|
|
ROF Fazakerly
|
|
551-570
|
Rifles for Pd Stores, Melton Mowbray
|
|
ROF Fazakerly
|
Post war manf
|
PF1 - PF11000
|
|
|
BSA Shirley
|
|
PS1 - PS 10000
|
|
|
ROF Fazakerly
|
|
PF12000 - PF 111999
|
|
|
ROF Fazakerly
(
|
|
PF112000 - PF112099
|
Order short closed.
|
|
ROF Fazakerly
|
100000
|
PF118000 - PF217999
|
|
|
ROF Fazakerly
|
|
PF218000 - PF219799
|
|
|
ROF Fazakerly
|
|
PF225948 - PF250947
|
|
In the mid 1950s the entire Fazakerly manufactury, and probably also that of BSA Shirley, was shipped to Pakistan, and set up at Wah Cantt as the Pakistan Ordnance Factory ( POF).
Their No.4 rifle production continued until well into the 1960s. By 1961, these rifles were usually serial numbered such as "61/P.O.F./C12345", but whether the earlier POF production may have continued the "PF" series is uncertain.
See: The Lee-Enfield - by Ian Skennerton - page 371
Return to: TOP of PAGE
See this website's Raison d'être