SITE MAP * HOME * ENFIELD & TRAINING RIFLES * TARGET RIFLES * SIGHTS * AIMING * TARGETS * LITERATURE * SUB-CALIBRE * SUB-TARGET * MISCELLANEOUS * BIBLIOGRAPHY * CHRONOLOGY * LINKS
YOU ARE VISITING THE PAGES OF THE U.K. N.R.A. HISTORIC ARMS RESOURCE CENTRE - MINIATURE CALIBRE RIFLES RESEARCH SITE - COPYRIGHT © 2009
by W.H. Fuller from his book "Small-bore target Shooting" - 1963
This extract is probably one of the most comprehensive, carefully considered and researched pieces ever published on the subject.
It is a MUST read for anyone experiencing difficulties such as 'shot-stringing', 'two-group diagrams' and other inconsistent results.
You may suspect this would now be a dated assessment but, with a very few obvious exceptions, the information is as relevant today as it ever was!
THE small-bore marksman should understand that technically there never can be a perfect result, either in practice or in theory. No combination of rifle, ammunition and rifleman can put ten consecutive shots through one hole, the size of that of a single bullet. The target will always reveal, by enlargement of the hole, deviations from perfect accuracy.
Fig.1 : A …….....................…..B
Ten Shots Thro' One Hole
A) - The impossible "ten shots through one hole"-where it would appear that only one shot has passed through the target.
B) - The possible "ten shots in one hole". A few authentic groups of this size have been shot during the past few years, not invariable by top flight marksmen.
However, "flash" results might appear to negative
the facts. For example, every marksman will at some time fire two shots in a
string of ten which will pass through the same hole. At rare intervals, a few
marksmen will fire two consecutive shots which will do the same thing.
Rifle and ammunition have compensatory effects and faults in one are corrected often by recoil, jump and flip. However, from averages of leading marksmen through the years, it is known that the marksman is not as yet, the weakest link in the chain. If the two mechanical factors were so improved that half-inch groups were a matter of course, many marksmen would be able to shoot to that standard. Further, an expert rifleman can, on occasion, shoot to a standard as high as can be achieved from a test-bed, but whereas a test-bed is likely to maintain its performance indefinitely, the marksman will not. Inversely, test shooting from a test-bed will not always improve on results obtained by a good shooter in tip-top form.
Rifle and ammunition will produce groups of specific size and shape. Errors of the riflemen will produce groups of varying size and shape. Sometimes a combination will produce a larger group. Sometimes when compensation is consistent a smaller group may result. But a group of some size will always be formed.
Fig.2 : A……………………………B………………………….C
Laws of Chance and Grouping
A - Certainty. Every shot will certainly fall inside the diameter of the group of which a combination is capable.
B - Indeterminacy. But the shots (A, B, C) may fall anywhere inside that diameter and in any order. Where, is indeterminable.
C- Probability. It is probable that more shots will fall towards the centre than away from it.
The distribution of shots within the group is, however, subject
to chance. Although the reasons for inaccuracies may be causal, they have to
be considered as casual, because there is little to be recognised to account
for the departures from accuracy and almost nothing that can be done to correct
the apparent errors. Laws of chance apply. If a combination of rifle, ammunition
and rifleman shoot regularly into a certain shape and size of group and nothing
additional interferes, then it can be stated with "certainty" that
the next shot will fall into the same group. But this law does not state where
inside the group the next shot will fall. It may drop on any one of the previous
shots, or it may drop away to the extreme limit of the group: the second law-"indeterminacy".
Such shooting can be disturbing to the rifleman who may not realize that it
is normal. A third law says that there is the "probability" that more
shots will fall towards the centre than away from it. When large showers of
projectiles are involved, the law will be seen to work, but it will not appear
to apply to the comparatively few shots on a small-bore target, although it
does do so when many TARGETS
Chance permits strange combinations to appear almost continuously and those which include closely grouped shots within the group are most likely to mislead. To get two, three, or even more shots very close together, particularly successive shots, is a result of pure chance.
Fig.3 - Chance Effects (1)
The presence of three shots in a tight cluster in the centre of a group does not indicate a good rifle, good ammunition or good shooting. It is mere chance and although such displays are constantly occurring they should not mislead the marksman.
They are unlikely to indicate the true centre of the group, nor
are they the result of extra good shooting. Suppose a rifle and a batch of ammunition
having a two-inch group are handed to a rifleman with a two¬inch group ability.
His first shot is fired when both left-hand group limits are operative, and
it falls on the extreme left hand of a four-inch group. His second shot is fired
with both right-hand limits predominating and this shot falls four inches away
from the first. His third shot is fired on his left-hand bent, but with the
rifle selecting its right-hand limit; and his fourth shot on his right-hand
bent and the rifle on its left hand. These last two shots drop dead on top of
one another in the centre of the four-inch group, but they do not indicate good
shooting-two wrongs cannot make a right-for all four shots were cited as being
The marksman then centralizes his aim for the fifth shot and the rifle-ammunition group elects to shoot centrally also. This shot passes through the hole made by the third and fourth shots. Because three of the five shots pass through one hole, they are not proof of good shooting. They mean very little; the marksman has no means of knowing why they went where they did. The only holes which indicate anything definite are the first two, four inches apart, that fix the diameter of the possible rifle-ammunition-rifleman group, and the actual quality of the shooting. It follows that what happens inside the group is of no consequence; though it can be of interest to the individual marksman, if he does not assume that the tightest collection of shots on a target represent the true centre of the group and a standard to which he and his equipment should always shoot.
Fig.4 - Chance Effects (2)
Key-holing of shots outside the to-ring also means very little.
Either of the two shots in the 9-ring could have fallen anywhere inside the three dotted rings, even to making good centres.
A peculiar coincidence often occurs at long-range TARGETS
The rifleman fires the early shots of a string into the centre. Then, for no
apparent reason, two consecutive shots appear very close together out in the
nine zone. He diagnoses a change in position as the cause; in most cases he
will be correct; but he will be inclined to think his shooting, although he
has erred in one respect, has remained good. Actually it is only chance which
has brought the two shots so very close together. Both shots could be due to
a changed group centre, the result of changed body position, or either could
be due to a temporary lapse of hold.
The criterion of the ability of a set-up to shoot lies in the size of the group fixed by the widest spaced shots. If the size of such a group coincides with the diameter of the 10-ring, the marksman will shoot possibles and it is obvious that his primary object should be to shoot tight groups, which can be achieved only if he practises group shooting for that purpose alone. Taking a few shots for sighting a rifle before a match card is not group shooting: in fact as soon as the sights are touched, it becomes "application" shooting. The first requirement in group-shooting practice is to leave the sights severely alone and to alter them only at the end of a ten-shot string in readiness for the next.
The usefulness of any practice is not confined to the interest aroused from card to card. It should encompass the whole aspect of practising to shoot a normal series of cards. A marksman shooting in leagues in a club does not usually have more than two competition cards to shoot each week, but if he enters competitions at open meetings he finds himself committed, particularly in squadded events, to shooting a string of four or more cards. This may quite easily strain the ability of the club man who is used to shooting only one or two cards at a time. Therefore, any serious group shooting should aim at getting at least four strings of ten shots off under a seven-minute time schedule for each card, to cater for open meeting events.
Another aspect of sight changing during practice should be considered. If a marksman shoots a possible on a competition card without changing sights, an ideal group has been shot, not altogether because the sights were exactly adjusted, but because of his good shooting. It follows that the marksman who wants to practise good shooting as distinct from scoring should leave the sights alone. Again, if a marksman shoots possibles without sight changing, as most possibles are shot, he could have done so without using the spotting 'scope. Discarding the telescope during competition shooting is not advised, but in group practice it is sound to look upon it as a liability.
The beginner, and even the experienced marksman who is practising, should set out with three determinations in mind, at least for the first two or three 10-shot strings: (1) to shoot strings of not less than ten shots in five or six minutes; (2) to eschew sight changing; (3) to discard the telescope. Then the whole attention can be given to shooting without any distractions. Any marksman who shoots consistently to such a programme will be very surprised by the real quality of his shooting. It may also draw his attention to reasons for faulty competition shooting, which may not always arise out of the failings of his own gunmanship. Later, when he finds the standard of his group shooting has improved, he can incorpor¬ate the telescope and sight changing into his programme. The beginner, in particular, should not use a telescope-he can always get someone to 'scope for him-until he has reached a standard of ability and confidence.
When practising group shooting the marksman's whole attention should be given to repeating both the same hold and the same aiming for all shots. It is disastrous to get into the habit of blazing off the ten rounds in as short a time as possible, thinking "it doesn't matter". Every practice round should be given as much care as, if not more than, a round that will count on a competition card; otherwise its value is completely lost. In addition, fast, irresponsible shooting can easily develop careless aiming and inattentive thinking.
To ensure that the group shall give the best possible information the ten shots should be fired at one diagram. It is not too easy to estimate the size of a short-range group or its centre if the shots are scattered over five or ten diagrams, and to move from one to another may involve positional troubles. True, the shooter will have to move over when shooting competition cards, but for his basic grouping practice it is best to shoot at one diagram.
Having shot the group, it becomes simple to change the sights to centralize the group on the target. A suggestion may be that one or two of the worst shots should be omitted and the group centralized on the remainder. But as these shots, unless they are "declared out", represent his true ability and they should be considered. The second string of shots may prove that the outsiders are not a general expression of the shooting and could have been left out, but the shooter is not to know this. Even then, only partial proof lies in the group shot by the second string.
Sights cannot be set on the position of one or two shots. To try is likely to lead to the disheartening practice known as "chasing the error", where a marksman continually changes his sights from one shot to another, first from one side, then the other, or up and down.
Fig.6 - Chasing the Error
A common fault, due to unnecessary fiddling with the sights.
The exercise usually includes several passes across the target before stability is reached.
As the grouping ability of the modern rifle is about one minute of angle, i.e., four clicks, there is little point in chasing the disposition of a shot that might be only one click out and will always be within the group size of the complete set-up. It is far better to fire a complete string of shots and to reset the sights from the total evidence given.
However, in a club where practice time is at a premium and each shooter is allowed only time to get in one practice card before his competition cards, or where a shooter is limited by expense, the best way is to combine the grouping practice with sight setting. Fire seven shots at one aiming-mark with as much care as possible without the 'scope. Then reset the sights if necessary and fire the next two or three shots at one or two other diagrams. Break down completely after the seventh shot and then shoot the remaining shots as if starting an entirely new string. The last three shots will indicate whether the sights did need to be adjusted, but bear in mind that these three shots are just as likely to exhibit the outside characteristics of your shooting as did the first seven.
When resetting the sights the shooter's eye should follow the resetting. It is easy, particularly for the shooter who will remain in the aim for the whole ten shots, to move the rear-sight across the sight-line without moving the sight-line.
The target results of this error usually appear in the following manner. After three of four shots the marksman decides, because all the shots hang on one edge of the ten-ring, to move the sights up or over two clicks. He does this, but the next two shots still hit the edge of the ring in the same place. He may then wonder if he did actually put the sights on, or perhaps thinking that the sights are not working as they should, puts two more on.
Fig.6 - Cheating the Sight-Line
It is easily possible for the rear-sight to be moved across the sight-line whilst the eye and fore-sight remain fixed. Every sight change should be accompanied by a complete breakdown of aim and even of hold.
Again the shots drop on the same spot, so he puts on two more,
shuffles his body round a little and then finds his next two shots right out
on the other side. Although the rear-sight has been moved, the eye has not followed
its course and remains in the same position as previously. Three or four clicks
mean very little when resetting the head, but they mean an inch at 100 yards.
It is always necessary after having made a sight change to break down completely
and then to rebuild the hold making sure that the eye is properly centred behind
the rear-sight aperture.
If a sight tends to show sluggishness in movement, it fails to appear to move backwards and forwards click by click, the difficulty can be overcome, until the sight can be sent for repair, by moving the sight five clicks to the right and then four to the left to obtain a one-click sideways movement. This sight fault can be due to wear on the lead screws or their mating threads, or to a knock having jammed the slides tighter than they should be.
Having cited a few cases of group pictures by manufacturing deliberate faults at the firing-point, it should be possible to diagnose a target group for similar faults from the shooter's end.
The shape and size of a group depends on the rifle, the rifle¬man
and the ammunition.
The rifle is the factor likely to be more constant than the other two, particularly over a comparative short time. A poor barrel will often shoot a group having an empty centre over a large diameter and may pack more shots in one place than another. This could arise out of an insufficiency of shots but, if the effects are noticeable over a series of cards, the barrel should be suspected.
A rifle that shoots an elongated group may do so for two reasons. If the ellipse is vertical or nearly so, it can be because of variation in bullet velocity, which may be inherent in the batch of ammunition, or, more likely, to a weak or indifferent striker spring. If the ellipse spreads across the target, provided wind is not responsible, it can be because of faulty bedding of the barrel in the stock. Check the fixings, and the free move¬ment of the barrel if it is intended to be fully floating. Examine the trough of the fore-end for bruise and "rub" marks, where the barrel can be "tapping" the stock when it vibrates as the rifle is fired. These small "touch" areas should be scraped down with a tool until the barrel can move freely and fully in all directions. With a rifle that has a pressure pad near the top end of the fore-end (rather rare these days) make sure that it is sufficiently high for the barrel to remain in contact with it as the barrel is stressed out from the stock. The pressure required depends largely on the design of the rifle, but it is usually between about three and five pounds. With a fully bedded barrel or one with barrel clamps, be certain that the barrel remains in contact with the fixings and that these are tight in the stock. Loose or variable fixings are likely to change the centre of the group, but may or may not affect its size. Check that when the barrel is stressed over in the stock it immediately returns to its original position and does not "hang over" in the direction to which it is stressed.
Fig.7 - Group Diagnosis (1) The Rifle
The TARGETS and groups are drawn to emphasize the distribution of shots. In practice, the groups will generally be larger but it is the shape of the group which gives the information, not the size.
I ) - Indicative of a poor barrel.
II ) - Varying ignition-weak striker-spring or damaged firing pin. The group will be vertical or nearly so.
III ) - Faulty bedding. The group may be at any angle, with one end more heavily loaded than the other.
IV ) - Loose stock fixings-two groups may form from shots in any order.
V) - Stock-barrel shift-due to recoil shock with slow recovery, or to temperature effects: again faulty bedding.
VI ) - Leading. Each successive shot will climb a little higher, then drop back into the centre and the sequence be repeated. The sketch shows two equal shot cycles, but in practice, the number of shots to complete any cycle is unpredictable.
A rifle that "always" puts its first shot out and
then continues to shoot like clockwork can be affected by stock-barrel temperature,
from stock-barrel shift, or by shock shift. The first fault may be the result
of insecure bedding or be the result of inadequate curing of the timber, or
by a shake fault; the second, by partially loose fixings and the third by fixings
which are affected by sling stresses. There is little that can be done with
an uncured or straked stock and scrapping is the only real answer. If the stock
is free of shakes, remove it from the barrel and keep it in a warm airing-cupboard
for two or three weeks. Then re-bed the barrel correctly in all respects. Shock
shift is usually caused by weak fixings allowing the sling to stress the barrel
to one side after the first shot. When the rifle is rested after shooting, the
barrel eases its way back to its original position.
A rifle that changes its group centre or size suddenly during the course of a shoot is almost certain to be suffering from a loose and, therefore changing fixing, affecting another fixing. This is most likely to be in the rifle, but it could be due to sling fittings sliding into or out of position.
A rifle that allows the shots to creep gradually out of the 10-ring for, perhaps, four or five shots and then suddenly drops back again and repeats this, has leading trouble, which can sometimes be cured by a thorough scouring. If a barrel leads up repeatedly, then, although it may shoot excellent groups. when free of it, it should be discarded for continuously high level shooting. Leading is likely to occur without warning and regular cleaning will not always eliminate the fault in time.
Some rifles appear to need shooting in after cleaning. Thirty or forty shots have to be fired through the barrel before it settles down. The reason is a failing barrel: the surface of the metal has deteriorated and requires "plating" before the rifle will shoot. Sometimes such a barrel can be put right by expert attention, but generally, it should be strongly suspected and too much money should not be spent on it. Such a barrel may sometimes demonstrate the characteristics of a leaded barrel, but to a lesser degree.
Fig.8 - Group Diagnosis (2) Ammunition
Unsuitable or poor ammunition. Note tight centre cluster and the few wild outside shots.
Nearly all these target effects produced by a faulty rifle
are also capable of being produced by both ammunition and the marksman. TARGETS
should, therefore, be examined for more decisive evidence from one or both of
these sources before drastic action is taken.
The second factor-comparatively easy to assess-is the ammunition, which will usually cause elongated patterns, that may not be always vertical, as might be expected from velocity variations. This sometimes depends on the suitability of a particular brand of ammunition in relation to bedding charac¬teristics. The easiest way to check is to use ammunition of different velocity during tests. Diagnosis is usually easier to make if the "feel" of recoil is coupled with results on the target, but experience is necessary in interpreting such short term indications.
Fig.9 - Group Diagnosis (3) The Rifleman
I) - Unsettled fore-hand position.
11) - Trigger Pulling.
III) - Pushing the butt forward with the shoulder.
IV) - Poor aiming-variable hold or inefficient sights or sighting.
The marksman factor is a much wider field of speculation. As a rough guide, large circular patterns can be traced to a marksman's poor aiming and to bad selection of sight apertures. Good central groups with occasional flyers are often caused by changes in hold or position. The effects of trigger pulling, and bounce on the forehand have been noted already, but there are other symptoms as shown in the accompanying illustrations.
Diagnosis of group patterns may not be so obvious as may be assumed from the foregoing, but there are savers or methods by which the picture can be clarified before an actual diagnosis is made. For example, in high-level shooting, where rifle and ammunition are normally likely to have been efficiently selected by the marksman, deviations can almost certainly be ascribed to him. Except for TARGETS shot by the veriest beginner, the rifle-ammunition characteristics usually predominate inside the group. Therefore the outside departures are the only shots that need investigation.
Fig.10 - Group Diagnosis (4)
Distribution of shots in the centre is due to chance and is therefore not capable of diagnosis. Only shots outside are subject.
Shots that hit the centre can be ignored, they have scored their maximum number of points. As the pattern inside the ring is of no consequence and the position of the shots purely a "chance" arrangement, these too, are of no interest.
The number of departures on a single target, even for a medium ability shooter, is however, small and usually quite inadequate to give a true indication of shooting faults. It is necessary to examine a large number of TARGETS and to make the diagnosis from a continuous record spread over a long period. Records from less than about twenty TARGETS are not of much value. Long term records will clearly show the marksman's outstanding errors and these, when eliminated, will leave evidence of finer details from which further diagnoses can be made. To keep such records have a small piece of card and mark on it, immediately after shooting, the positions of shots that fail to hit to the standard fixed by the rifleman. It is unnecessary to record either the numerical value of the shot or its distance from the centre; only the direction of the excursion should interest the investigator. A shooting fault that puts a shot just out of the ring is the same fault that puts it into the 8-ring. The type of error has to be found, not its magnitude.
Standards of recording vary. The beginner will find it beneficial to start his recording with all shots that do not make the 8-ring, at least, until he learns to centralize the majority of his shots.
Fig.11 - Group Diagnosis (5)
The distance of a shot from the centre is not so important as its direction. A fault which puts a shot on the edge of the to-ring could, if only slightly more emphasised, have put it into the g or even the 8-ring.
The medium class club shot will need to record only the shots
that do not make the 10-ring. The expert will be interested only in those which
do not make the centre. These standards are not the same as the numerical evaluation
of them. The shots the marksman records could, by the laws of chance, have fallen
anywhere within the limits of the rifle¬ammunition group. Therefore, elaborate
records do not give any better diagnosis than rough guides.
If desired the clock-face can be drawn in on the record card, but in practice this is not necessary. All that is needed is to establish which is the top, 12 o'clock, edge of the card, and the most convenient means of doing this is always to write the date of the card in the same place-say, along the bottom edge.
Fig.12 - Error Record Cards
A) - Indexed card for a beginner. It represents shots outside the 9-ring for his first twenty TARGETS over a period of ten weeks. It indicates trouble with the forehand (probably the sling) and pulling the trigger.
B) - Record for a marksman shooting to an average of 99.9 over thirty short-range cards. Again forehand trouble - when there is any!
Fig.12a - Rapid Diagnosis Chart
Shot deflections into the angles covered by the arrows are likely to be caused by faults of the rifleman.
A) - Resting the fore-end towards the top of the palm or canting the rifle to the right.
B) - Pressing the rifle over to the right to hold the sights on or canting the rifle to the left.
C) - Trigger pulling-which could include pulling back steadily with the hand.
D) - Forcing the shoulder on to the butt.
E) - Pressing the rifle over to the left to hold the sights on.
F) - Lifting the fore-end into the aiming-mark.
G) - Forcing the sights down.
The illustrations, Fig. 12, show the type of records likely to emerge. Record cards should be filed for future reference. A marksman may assume, that, having cured himself of a fault, it has been finally overcome. The fact is that he will always have a tendency to revert to it, and therefore, he should write on the record card what steps were taken to cure the fault.
The accompanying departure diagram can be referred to after the marksman has obtained a record from which a com¬parison can be made. The diagram covers faults that are most likely to be made by the marksman, but similar departures can be produced by faults in the rifle or in the ammunition or in both. It does not cover errors likely to arise from atmos¬pheric conditions, wind, mirage or changing light. These effects can normally be coupled with the shooter's normal senses and are additive to the general group patterns obtained under steady conditions. It is advisable not to include in the record cards departures made under adverse conditions unless they are so marked.
See also: Miniature Calibre Cartridges
Return to: SITE MAP or MENU PAGE or TOP of PAGE